Wiring A House For Pros By Pros Pdf Writer

Posted on admin
  1. Wiring A House For Pros By Pros Pdf Writers

Located about five kilometres West of Silverton, the Mundi Mundi Plains is a truly breathtaking place. Looking out onto the expansive Mundi Mundi Plains, it’s a perfect spot to take in a sunset or picnic.

Wiring

The view must be seen to be believed. The wide, flat heart of the Australian outback extends seemingly forever. On a clear day the curvature of the earth can be seen. Of course, a lot of people have seen the area yet may not realise it, spotlighted as it was in the famous crash scene of Mad Max 2. Sharp-eyed explorers can even find old sets from the movie smattered around.

To find out more about Mundi Mundi look out The 42-acre cemetery is a sombre reminder of the harsh lives lived in Silverton’s early years. Mining accidents were tragically common. Isolation meant that fresh water, fruit, vegetables and sanitation was often in short supply. Typhoid was a constant part of life that took many children. The Silverton Historical Cemetery is a final resting place for some of the region’ Fenced in 1888, today the cemetery is a historical site and cannot be disturbed. To find out more about The Silverton Historical Cemetery Located nine kilometres West of Silverton, Umberumberka Reservoir continues to operate to this day.

Open from 8.30am until 3.30pm every day, visitors can inspect the pumping station, view the reservoir and enjoy the picnic sites and gardens. Water was in short supply in Silverton’s early days.

  • For Pros By Pros: Working Alone (eBook). Working Alone Cover. For Pros By Pros: Working Alone (eBook). By CARROLL, JOHN. If youre working alone, this book will be. And if youre a homeowner working on your own house, you will be amazed at what you can accomplish. Installing windows and doors.
  • PDF Download Wiring a House: 5th Edition (For Pros By Pros) Full Ebook,PDF Free Wiring a House: 5th Edition (For Pros By Pros) Ebook,Books Online Wiring a House: 5th Edition (For Pros By Pros) ePub free,PDF Download Wiring a House: 5th Edition (For Pros By Pros) Full Ebook,PDF Free Wiring a House: 5th Edition.

Wiring A House 5th Edition For Pros By Pros Library Download Book (PDF and DOC) Wiring A House 5th Edition For Pros By Pros. By Pros, Book Wiring A House 5th Edition For Pros By Pros, And Wiring A House 5th Edition For Pros By Pros PDF. In electronic format take uphardly any space. If you travel a lot, you can easily download Wiring A House.

Locals relied on household tanks, wells and nearby Umberumberka Creek for a drink. There was never a lot of rain. To find out more about The Umberumberka Reservoir Mining was the reason that Silverton sprang up in the first place, and its still possible to experience what life was like for men working in its heyday.

The Day Dream Mine is located northwest of Silverton and about 20 kilometres outside of Broken Hill. Established in 1882, the mine attracted a sizeable settlement which, while short-lived, boasted 500-odd residents at its peak, as well as the district’s first smelters to find out more about The Day Dream Mine Take a scenic walk on Silverton’s Heritage Walking Trail. It takes around 2 hours walking time taking in all of Silvertons sights and buildings, you will walk through a railroad cutting and also see the Mundi Mundi (Mad max Lookout)). No dogs are allowed on the trail, and it is recommended that you carry water as it can can get quite warm. For the walking trail map The Silverton Donkeys have been around for years. The donkeys had become part of the town and people came back partly because of themthe town wouldn’t be the same without them.

The donkeys had established quite a repertoire of “bad behaviour”. They would stop cars, sticking their heads in open windows looking for treats and they visited the town businesses each day, again looking for anything that could be conned away from people. And read more about the Silverton Donkeys The horses, camels and cattle you will see around Silverton are all owned by people living in Silverton.

They live on the Common which is managed by the Silverton Temporary Common Trust. The Trust keeps an eye on all the livestock and if feed or water is becoming scarce, the number of animals on the Common is reduced. All the livestock roam freely, so please drive carefully, especially at night.

And read more about the horses, camels and cattle. Silverton’s creeks are usually dry. They are home to big, beautiful gum trees, Silverton Gums, which are our very own species of River Red Gum. The seeds of the Silverton Red Gum have been harvested at various times for regenerating areas of high salt levels, as the trees are renowned for their salt tolerance. And read more about Silverton’s creeks.

The capacity to reflect, reason, and draw conclusions based on our experiences, knowledge, and insights. It’s what makes us human and has enabled us to communicate, create, build, advance, and become civilized. Thinking encompasses so many aspects of who our children are and what they do, from observing, learning, remembering, questioning, and judging to innovating, arguing, deciding, and acting.

For

There is also little doubt that all of the new technologies, led by the Internet, are shaping the way we think in ways obvious and subtle, deliberate and unintentional, and advantageous and detrimental The uncertain reality is that, with this new technological frontier in its infancy and developments emerging at a rapid pace, we have neither the benefit of historical hindsight nor the time to ponder or examine the value and cost of these advancements in terms of how it influences our children’s ability to think. There is, however, a growing body of research that technology can be both beneficial and harmful to different ways in which children think. Moreover, this influence isn’t just affecting children on the surface of their thinking. Rather, because their brains are still developing and malleable, frequent exposure by so-called digital natives to technology is actually wiring the in ways very different than in previous generations. What is clear is that, as with advances throughout history, the technology that is available determines how our brains develops. For example, as the technology writer has observed, the emergence of reading encouraged our brains to be focused and imaginative. In contrast, the rise of the Internet is strengthening our ability to scan information rapidly and efficiently.

The effects of technology on children are complicated, with both benefits and costs. Whether technology helps or hurts in the development of your children’s thinking depends on what specific technology is used and how and what frequency it is used. At least early in their lives, the power to dictate your children’s relationship with technology and, as a result, its influence on them, from synaptic activity to conscious thought. Over the next several weeks, I’m going to focus on the areas in which the latest thinking and research has shown technology to have the greatest influence on how children think: attention, information overload, and /learning. Importantly, all of these areas are ones in which you can have a counteracting influence on how technology affects your children.

Wiring A House For Pros By Pros Pdf Writers

Attention You can think of attention as the gateway to thinking. Without it, other aspects of thinking, namely, perception, memory, language, learning, reasoning, problem solving, and decision making are greatly diminished or can’t occur at all. The ability of your children to learn to focus effectively and consistently lays the foundation for almost all aspects of their growth and is fundamental to their development into successful and happy people.

Attention has been found to be a highly malleable quality and most directly influenced by the in which it is used. This selective attention can be found in the animal kingdom in which different species develop attentional skills that help them function and survive.

For example, wolves, lions, tigers, and other predators have highly tuned visual attention that enables them to spot and track their prey. In contract, their prey, including deer and antelope, have well-developed auditory attention that allows them to hear approaching predators. In both cases, animals’ attentional abilities have developed based on the environment in which they live.

The same holds true for human development. Whether infant recognition of their ’ faces or students paying attention in class, children’s immediate environment determines the kind of attention that they develop. In generations past, for example, children directed considerable amounts of their time to reading, an activity that offered few distractions and required intense and sustained attention, imagination, and memory. The advent of television altered that attention by offering children visual stimuli, fragmented attention, and little need for imagination. Then the Internet was invented and children were thrust into a vastly different environment in which, because distraction is the norm, consistent attention is impossible, imagination is unnecessary, and memory is inhibited.

Technology conditions the brain to pay attention to information very differently than reading. The metaphor that Nicholas Carr uses is the difference between scuba diving and jet skiing.

Book reading is like scuba diving in which the diver is submerged in a quiet, visually restricted, slow-paced setting with few distractions and, as a result, is required to focus narrowly and think deeply on the limited information that is available to them. In contrast, using the Internet is like jet skiing, in which the jet skier is skimming along the surface of the water at high speed, exposed to a broad vista, surrounded by many distractions, and only able to focus fleetingly on any one thing. In fact, have shown that reading uninterrupted text results in faster completion and better, recall, and learning than those who read text filled with hyperlinks and ads. Those who read a text-only version of a presentation, as compared to one that included video, found the presentation to be more engaging, informative, and entertaining, a finding contrary to conventional, to be sure.

Additionally, contrary to conventional educational wisdom, students who were allowed Internet access during class didn’t recall the lecture nor did they perform as well on a test of the material as those who weren’t “wired” during class. Finally, reading develops reflection, critical thinking, problem solving, and vocabulary better than visual media.

Exposure to technology isn’t all bad. Shows that, for example, video games and other screen media improve visual-spatial capabilities, increase attentional ability, reaction times, and the capacity to identify details among clutter. Also, rather than making children stupid, it may just be making them different.

For example, the ubiquitous use of Internet search engines is causing children to become less adept at remembering things and more skilled at remembering where to find things. Given the ease with which information can be find these days, it only stands to reason that knowing where to look is becoming more important for children than actually knowing something.

Not having to retain information in our brain may allow it to engage in more “higher-order” processing such as contemplation, critical thinking, and problem solving. What does all this mean for raising your children? The bottom line is that too much screen time and not enough other activities, such as reading, playing games, and good old unstructured and imaginative play, will result in your children having their brains wired in ways that may make them less, not more, prepared to thrive in this crazy new world of technology. Thanks for writing this article. I'd like to comment on one passage: 'Not having to retain information in our brain may allow it to engage in more “higher-order” processing such as contemplation, critical thinking, and problem solving.' This statement suggests that there is a zero-sum relationship between lower-order retention and higher-order processing. This is probably not the case.

When you find people who are quite good at higher-order processing, these people usually have vast stores of personal knowledge about subjects that they contemplate, think critically about, and solve problems in. Knowledge that you 'own' is the fuel for higher-order processes. The Internet makes it easy not to own knowledge. It seems better and more efficient to rent it short-term, as-needed. The result is less higher-order processing, not more. How can a child practice higher-order processing without bits of knowledge in his or her head to manipulate, examine, and combine in different ways? There is something that does directly compete with higher-order processing - a demand for speed.

To practice higher-order processing as a child requires lots of time and space. You need patience with yourself and with the task at hand.

You need patience from others to let you proceed at the right pace. But patience of all types seems in short supply these days. If we could add more patience to the mix, I would be more optimistic. But I think the combination is deadly. If you need info fast, you are less likely to retain it when you find it. You become a Teflon conduit where nothing sticks.

You begin to equate learning and thinking with being this conduit. (Maybe Jaron Lanier could write another manifesto: You Are Not A Thin Client.) Perhaps a better idea is to teach new topics with information that you expect kids to retain and then process fully - topics that are more engaging to young minds like, say, sociology and technology. I agree with what you have to say - a basis of retained facts is necessary for higher-order processing.

Furthermore, I think the internet may be more damaging to memory than this article suggests. An article in Scientific American (stated that there are two main issues with the internet and retaining memory. First, a study by Columbia University showed that, if people assume that knowledge will be accessible later (if we know we can re-Google), they retain significantly less of that knowledge. Secondly, just the fact that we use the computer for knowledge may be impairing our ability to build up a set of facts upon which to conduct higher-order processing. A study by Indiana University neuroscience, Karin Harman James, showed that between writing information out in script, print, and typing the information, individuals who wrote the information in script retained the most of the information. Thus, we might be hindering ourselves just by using a keyboard to find our information. In terms of analyzing online information: it may not just be obtaining a store of information to conduct analysis, but also what type of information we obtain when online.

Stephan Lewandowsky Ph.D, in another article on Psychology Today (argues that blog comments and reviews (many from unreliable sources) can distort the knowledge we walk away with. Lewandowsky states: “One of the ways in which our memories can become inaccurate is if we are exposed to distorting information The tone of blog comments—that is whether they are civil or not—affects people’s attitudes towards something they don’t understand well.” This research suggests that, perhaps, we do not think as deeply and objectively when reading material online which is accompanied by comments. So if we come with little knowledge to an issue (because we have a depleted ability to retain information due to the internet or because this is a new issue and we are attempting to gain knowledge), it seems the internet will further hinder our ability to conduct higher-order reasoning. However, there might be hope.

An fMRI study by UCLA suggested that, in people who were considered “web-literate”, conduct Google searches shows more activity in brain areas involved in decision making and reasoning than reading a book: “While they were searching, their brains showed activation in the same regions that were involved in reading. But in some subjects, additional brain activity was recorded in brain areas involved in decision-making, complex reasoning, memory, and vision. The subjects whose brains got more active while googling were those from the web-savvy group” (study comes from the Scientific American article above). That said, the study only included 15 participants in the “web-savvy” group, so I don’t think it is in any way conclusive. I can only hope it holds some truth - our future generations may indeed become poor decision makers. Thanks for the interesting article!

However, your bottom line conclusion is not supported by the article at all. The link to a study on the nytimes site is a broken link, maybe it has something useful.

This is not a simple topic, and just throwing out a conclusion like that is not very helpful. Support your claims! The suggested alternative activities to screen time are: 'reading, playing games, and good old unstructured and imaginative play'. First of all, reading. Recent studies support the idea that 'videogames increasingly appear to be a solution to—rather than a cause of—the problem of adolescent boys and reading.' Source: 'The Mismeasure of Boys: Reading and Online Videogames by Constance Steinkuehler' My oldest son learned to read because he needed to communicate with other people playing World Of Warcraft online.

Next, unstructured and imaginative play. There are many games like Minecraft, which is an online collaborative world.

Kids work together to solve challenges, and just express their creativity. My daughter just last week built a huge rollercoaster with mechanical systems built in to stop the carts for loading and unloading of passengers. Minecraft is now the third most played online game in North America and Europe (source: Personally, I actually do limit my kids screen time, but for a positive reason - I want them to develop offline skills as well. Not for the negative reason that I think it harms them. I've done a lot of research on children being exposed to technology pre age 7. Bottom line is that according to a host of child developmental pyschologist and experts, screen time rewires the brain, causes ADHD and more. In the words of Gabor Mate, our children in North America are being so overstimulated, that they have the same emotional characteristics of those children raised in war-ravaged third world countries.

And it's not just the content, it's the screen itself that ravages the brain. I've written a summary of my findings here from experts as well as personal experience with my 7 year old having nightmares after screentime. Thank goodness for alternatives such as Waldorf and Montesorri Education. Great, let's see the research that you have done! More research is certainly needed in this area. I'm glad removing screens was a good solution for your child's nightmares. Anecdotal evidence like this is very compelling, but it does not mean that this is a good solution for every child.

As I said in my comment above, my son learned to read because he needed to communicate with other players in online games. Does that mean that maximum screen time for all kids is good? I don't think so, you can't draw a sweeping conclusion from a single example. I read your article with interest, but you only quote 'experts', with no links to research. This is not a simple issue, and many people have conflicting opinions on this subject. 'Child development experts' have been wrong many times in the past.

'As I said in my comment above, my son learned to read because he needed to communicate with other players in online games. Does that mean that maximum screen time for all kids is good? I don't think so, you can't draw a sweeping conclusion from a single example.' But did your son learn to read due to the screen time? Did the screen time assist his brain in learning reading? Or was it a matter of motivation to learn to read in order to play the game? As salutary as that kind of motivation may be, that's not the same as attributing success in reading to the computer game.

Wiring A House For Pros By Pros Pdf Writer

This may have indeed been the case for your son, to the benefit of his reading ability and overall education, but one also can't draw a sweeping conclusion from the example of your son - as wonderful as it is for him to have found that motivation and used it so well.:-) As a parent and a teacher of music, especially early childhood music, this is one topic near and dear to my heart, so any research I can read about it can inform my teaching.:-). Too much screen time is something that I struggle to accept with my 17 year old son, he is very creative and spends a lot of time using photoshop to create amazing drawings (he is doing his HSC art work on the screen). He also studies on the computer, doing research and typing up essays and as all boys his age plays games with his friends on the internet. My husband often complains about how much time he spends in front of the screen. I am thankful that he has a part time job at Kmart and goes to school, otherwise I think he would be in the one spot always!

The snag with 'I believe.' Is that its religion and politics not science.

It is interesting that we don't even ask the question about reading when 'book wormery' could easily render someone weak in social interaction or in poor physical health because they got no exercise. How much is to do with social and cultural bias? Is it really a problem? Why not an advantage? Computers are new so we have to treat them with caution/fear, books are very socially and culturally acceptable having had hundreds of years to gain this status.

I probably get most of my information from a screen these days - reading more but not so much books. I read more with interaction as here, than I did aged 16 now I'm 57. Is it better or worse or just different and reflecting the times? Where is the evidence that would stand scientific scrutiny? What is the question really about? Yup, always more questions than answers in something like this it seems to me.

I wasn't claiming Books Are Unalloyed Good vs. Computers Are Unalloyed Evil, just that they are different (duh) but dunno precisely how, and what the full ramifications really are. I don't disagree with how i read your overall attitude, and tho i love science i don't believe it can easily truly ferret things out.

Or that if it claims it can and shows some results that it is really something we can know is true, so even published results could probably dis/prove whatever we want if somebody spent the money to fund the appropriate study;-) so in other words i don't like anecdotal approaches alone but i also don't trust an 'only scientific' approach either. All avenues are food for thought. Real psychologists would probably turn up their nose at my characterization of what i see as a squishy science. (even something most people might consider more cut and try, namely medical biology, is full of the same complexity and subjectivity, so i'm not saying only psych is like this, i just mean anything other than mathematics is like this;-). @ What is the question really about? Well the article said that it was about how technology impacts children's ability to learn how to and then practice the art of thinking, 'The capacity to reflect, reason, and draw conclusions based on our experiences, knowledge, and insights.'

I think what comes up often is: attention span. Attention being required to get deep into things. Do kids these days lack the ability to pay attention vs. Previous generations of kids? If so how will they turn out as adults? Another is internal vs.

External memory. Is somebody who has all the presidents in their head a better thinker than somebody who has to look it up via google? Overall my thought is that good thinking requires the ability to take a bunch of information and make connections among it all and then draw conclusions from it all. They have been practicing that art a lot, that's how they get really good at it.

A good thinker who then also has access to technology can presumably do even better. But somebody who never got it together, who didn't really practice all the components enough in the first place because technology offered a way to obviate the skill, then they are lacking in that regard. You are not 16. So when you read online, do you do a good job avoiding clicking on links and advertisements? Do you read things through to the end? Somebody who is 16 and learned mostly via the computer, they might have a less linear approach.

And we have to ask what the results are. That kind of study would be interesting to me. As part of a college course assignment, I accepted the challenge to post a brief summary of my research findings to an online source or publication. I chose to comment on your article as it is one that I have cited in my paper and is very relevant to my findings. My research topic is ‘Electronic Media, Technology and a Child’s Developing Brain'.

As a result of my research, my conclusion is that with the always evolving types of technology, the impact it has on development is very complex and multi-dimensional. As you state in your article, whether technology helps or hinders in the growth of your children’s thinking depends on what types of technology are used and how often they are accessed.

If we are truly going to understand how technology influences regular brain functioning and brain organization many more studies are needed. Hi Anonymous, have you spent any time in Silicon Valley-home to many people for whom technology is their environment. Some of the hardest working people I've ever met work in hi-tech. What evidence do you find that our country is lazier now than when computers became popular? Are we lazier because of other technologies such as central heating, movies, and radio?

You're using technology to spread your opinion. So are you lazier than folks who never come online? When I see someone make a vague generalization-our country is lazy-I suspect the message is all about opinion and not fact. Now a days technology plays a vital role everywhere, its important that we should start making our kids comfortable with technology, well I don’t mean that we should turn them into geeks, lol. However, its always good to be up-to-date with the technology. As a parent I always teach my child how to use computers and internet. Liza, my 15 year old daughter is studying in a High school.

She wanted to prepare her project for a school competition, so I helped her completing her project. In the process, not only she completed her work but also understood how to use computers, I know next time, it’ll be a cake walk for her.

You can always try this with your kids. Trust me its fun!

A good read, you might like this:. '.we should start making our kids comfortable with technology.' Have you been out of the U.S. For the last ten years? Walk up to 10 eight-year-olds, hand them a new phone or camera and ask, can you show me how to use this? Nine out of those ten, if not all ten, will be able to show you all you need to know.

Our 'kids' are too comfortable with technology. What they need is to have it taken away for part of the day, because studies show they are spending so much time with it that they are doing little else. That, my friend, is a very bad thing, because every moment spent playing with a device is a moment spent NOT THINKING. We want our kids to be engaging their minds in the manipulation of thought. I mean, really, do you want this country to be run by adults who never really learned to think? We already have too many who can't think, because anyone who's pushing reliance on technology has not used their cognition to process this concept. Many kids who do grow up around more technology than their parents also have the benefit to do online school work and move at a faster pace than past generations.

They are given the opportunity to focus on their own skills and abilities when working with Internet and tech. They are able to, unlike u had said and I quote ' consistent attention is impossible' when it is difficult but not impossible ' imagination is unnecessary ' when children need to imagine ion to think outside their usual quota and think deeper when it comes to critical learning ' memory is inhibited ' when technology can better improve their memory and learning abilities with games resolving patterns or word problems. Kids don't need tech to better their learning but it's a great way for them to learn a different way to experience it from their parents. I went to the Comments section to say what the first poster, Susan L., said so well.

If you don't think we're already in deep s., consider that, of the countless folks who've read this article in the nearly three years since it was written, only three people.Susan L, Eugenia, and I.have the cognitive ability to see the fallacy in the assessment the author uses to suggest 'exposure to technology isn't all bad.' Even worse, apparently only I see the glaring contradiction in his response to Susan's analysis.

First, he states she makes 'a nice distinction from what many have argued.' The 'distinction' is from you argued. Then, in agreeing with her challenge of his argument, mind you, he states that he agrees 'that higher-order thinking requires ready access to information.' Well, since Susan stated that highly developed cognition requires actual knowledge, Dr. Taylor is agreeing with himself.he just doesn't realize it. But, how is it someone with a Ph.D.

Doesn't know the difference between actual, retained-in-one's-brain knowledge and 'ready access' to it? And, if he actually does agree with her (and Eugenia and me) and that was just poor phraseology on his part, then why didn't his article highlight that point instead of claiming its opposite is true (though scientifically impossible to achieve)? He then contradicts that statement by saying 'info, in my view, must be stored in the brain because higher-order thinking is built on the 'scaffolding' of the info.' But, in the article, he claims exposure to technology is good because 'not having to retain information in our brainsic may allow it to engage in more 'higher-order' processing, such as contemplation, critical thinking, and problem solving.' But, anyone who's ever seriously applied their cognitive skills knows there is NO contemplation, reflection, analysis, reasoning nor problem-solving going on without lots and lots of retained knowledge. It's called cultural literacy, and, without it, one is barely literate at all because it's critical to fully understanding the context within which something has been written. I mean no disrespect, but, seriously?

A professor at the Univ. Of San Francisco?

If we can't expect.and receive.quality writing and reasoning from a college professor, then from whom? The human brain is not fully developed until around age 25, give or take a year or so. If you continue to worship at the alter of technology, instead of treating it as an aid, like the manual and electric typewriters once were, and children are not receiving the superior K-6 education I and my peers received prior to 1966.and we all know few are.BEFORE getting involved in extensive exposure to technology, their brains will be hard-wired in ways we will NOT appreciate. Time to get serious about this.

These children will one day be running the country, but, as it stands now, they won't have the cognitive ability to do so with any degree of grace, efficiency and effectiveness. We're already on our way to 'h. in a hand-basket, thanks to an inadequate education system for over 40 yrs. Just look at the structure and punctuation errors in this article written by a Ph.D., for goodness sakes.

He doesn't care about producing quality work, and, because the rest of the world is too ignorant to know the difference, I suppose he figures he doesn't have to. Our future as a culture and a country requires that people start improving their own ability to think. Talk is cheap, people.

Make the speaker prove what he/she says. Anybody can say technology is our miracle cure or that, if children don't learn it early, life is effectively over for them or that it's the way of the world, so we must cater to it. Millions of people can gather in the public square and claim all these things and more, but not a one can prove any of these statements true. Please, our capacity to think is an amazing gift. Start using it for things that matter. If you don't, medical science is telling us you're more likely to end up with Alzheimer's instead, as will all your children and grandchildren whose minds were allowed to get lazy in lieu of Dr.

Taylor's 'ready-access' to knowledge on the Internet, a portion of which is always going to be wrong b/c its source is human beings who make mistakes, and, unfortunately, the younger the employee, the greater the mistakes.both in quantity and importance. Samaya, Concerns about the effect of technology on a child's developing brain is for therapists but not students?

Seriously?Can you elaborate? Assuming that being a student means you're still young, you are in the process of maturing into an adult who will be a member of a community and may be a parent raising your own children. Are you saying you already know all you need to know to be the best person, parent and adult you can be? If so, you're the only person in the history of the human race who's been able to say that.

Do your friends and classmates feel this way, too? If so, this country is in deep trouble, because most of you won't have enough knowledge nor a variety of knowledge sufficient for advanced thinking. If you can't engage in advanced cognition, who will benefit from your presence and contributions will you be able to make? I do hope you reconsider your position.

It isn't possible to have too much knowledge. Ninety-nine percent of what I read these days I read online-books, newspapers, magazines, blogs, and mail. What I like about eBooks is the ability to instantly look up the meaning or etymology of a word, or get background information if my knowledge bank is lacking. In my experience, connected reading allows me to comprehend better and go deeper. Aside about comments: One positive feature is that they usually provide various perspectives-much more so than will be found in the original piece. It is the clash of ideas-whether about Trump's performance last night or the origins of ISIS-that motivate me to think and often to do additional research. As a 'Millennial' on the younger end.

I must say you psychologists yap to much. Yes it needs to be moderated (duh). But studies show multimedia(non-interactive) actually is the best method for child development especially when it is all closely related (ex: sad music sad narration sad animation.) here is your source: Benefits and Pitfalls of Multimedia and Interactive Features in Technology-Enhanced Storybooks: A Meta-Analysis google that. Now read it and realize it might not be 100% but neither are you and to that one guy who criticized that other person about ' I believe' and saying this isn't religion or politics but science you obviously have to start with a belief. And putting down someones belief OBVIOUSLY makes you smart, regardless of their disadvantage if any i recommend this blog or wtvr starts acting its own age.

But i think you have a good lead mr jim wtvr. I just think you should read more scholar articles to get a well rounded view on it and like that guy said cite some stuff. Especially for us nerds trying to get off the screen while school / email / jobs / and friends all live in the convenience of my home. Lastly the screen is no good for your eyes.

That's the small downfall. But neither are books neither is the sun and as long as i can do eye muscle workouts or some lasik while i finish my degree like you sir to get a decent job in this shit economy i was born into ill have to risk my eyes for the wealth that i need to survive. And YES OLDER PEOPLE HAD IT BETTER!

They didnt have to compete for jobs like we live in india. Thanks free trade:) oh and tuition even with inflation is still over 100% what it was for you. And community college isn't free anymore to all you docs out their. And lastly if there is a University president out there reading this thanks for the subprime loan;) i can wait to spend the rest of my life trying to pay you back.

(wink) (snap).